Stephanie, the default content license, as written in the footer, is the Creative Commons license. This is easily adjustable and is by no means mandatory.
The XWiki code (which includes some of the original page contents) is under LGPL. They do not need to be equal or bound as far as I know. They are two fully different licenses. paul Le 8 mai 2011 à 11:11, [email protected] a écrit : > Hello again, > I am unsure about the license xwiki uses. When I have a look at my > xwiki installation it reads: ?This wiki is licensed under a Creative > Commons license?. However, when I take a look at the FAQs > ?http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/License? it says that ?XWiki > is distributed under the LGPL license version 2.1? > > Is there a difference between those two? If so, which one is applicable? > > I am asking because we have a customer who sells intranet SaaS > solutions for small and middle sized companies. The question is: would > it be OK if he integrates XWiki into his solutions. He does not want > to use functions provided by xwiki in his code/programm and he > wouldn?t charge extra for it. However he would alter the authorisation > process and change the style. > > Thanks very much for your help, > > Stephanie > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
