On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 13:30, Raluca Stavro <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> +0.7 to declare 16 the winner and improve it >> +0.2 to start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16 >> +0.1 to start all over >> >> What do you think about this: >> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation-engineering.png >> ? > > I like this one, i voted for > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/LogoChallenge#HProposal8RalucaStavro > after all ;)
I also find it better. Thanks -Vincent > >> >> Raluca. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello Community, >>> >>> The search for the XWiki.org logo isn't over yet... >>> >>> The second round of votes finished, with the following results: >>> >>> +9 for 4 >>> +4 for 12 (I counted Thibaut's +1 for 12A as a +1 for 12) >>> +1 for 15 >>> +14 for 16 >>> +1 for 19 >>> >>> Normally, 16 would be the winner, but since several key members of the >>> community objected to it, I see three ways to proceed: >>> >>> 1. Declare 16 as the elected logo, but further improve it to soften the >>> objections >>> 2. Start a third round between improved version of 4 and 16 >>> 3. Slow down a bit, since there's no hard deadline to meet, and start >>> all over, accepting new proposals >>> >>> I for one would go for option 1, if Vincent, Ludovic, Guillaume, Fabio >>> agree. >>> >>> On 04/08/2010 06:02 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >>>> Hello XWiki Community, >>>> >>>> We're still looking for the new XWiki.org logo. First of all, many >>>> thanks to all those who submitted their ideas ( >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallenge ). After the >>>> first round of votes (digest here: >>>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ah6DqXzfHT2vdHV5Ty1LX3lKU3U5V3M4YmNFSXEzcVE&hl=en), >>>> >>>> we chose 6 "popular" proposals for the second round: >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 . >>>> >>>> The authors of these proposals were asked to do the following, if not >>>> already done for round 1: >>>> * try to integrate any constructive feedback that came with the >>>> votes (a digest of the feedback from the emails is available for each >>>> proposal on >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 ) >>>> * polish the design (if they consider it necessary) >>>> * provide the requested variations for .org, enterprise and office >>>> * provide samples for light and dark background >>>> * provide a black&white version >>>> * provide a 16X16 icon containing the logo or a representative part >>>> of the logo >>>> * provide a nice "Powered by XWiki" button that goes with the logo >>>> * provide a mockup/screenshot with the logo used in the current >>>> skin, colibri >>>> >>>> For most of the finalist logos, the _final_ versions were already >>>> uploaded here: >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2 . >>>> For those who were not updated, we will use the initial submissions >>>> for round 2 as well, >>>> and voters will have to use their imagination in case >>>> any of the required use cases is missing. >>>> >>>> >>>> VOTING: >>>> >>>> You can send your vote on the mailing list ([email protected] or >>>> [email protected]), in reply to this email. No twitter votes this time. >>>> >>>> Each voter can grant a whole +1 to only one of the 6 finalists >>>> ( >>>> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/Community/LogoChallengeRound2#HFinalistproposals >>>> ). >>>> >>>> IMPORTANT: Before choosing a logo based on your personal preference, >>>> please try to also ask yourself the following questions: >>>> >>>> * Is it distinctive? Note that it should not resemble other logos, >>>> including the XWiki SAS/xwiki.com logo. >>>> * Is it easy to remember and recognize? >>>> * Does it blend in smoothly with the Colibri skin? With the new >>>> XWiki.org skin? Note that adjustments to the skin is possible, in order >>>> to better integrate with the logo. >>>> * Is the design scalable? Could it (or parts of it) be >>>> successfully used in a 16X16 icon? Would it look good on a very large >>>> poster? >>>> * Can it be used (as it is, or adapted) on both light and dark backgrounds? >>>> * What would it look like in black and white (not just grayscale)? >>>> It's ok if some details are lost, but it needs to still look >>>> attractive and keep the main features. >>>> >>>> >>>> TIMELINE: >>>> >>>> 08/Apr/10 : Beginning of second round of votes on [email protected], >>>> [email protected] >>>> 11/Apr/10 : End of votes >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
