> > IMO it's a bit too late to give -1 for a logo that passed the first > round. Is it less readable now? > > 16 was voted by 11 community members (including myself) in the first > round. Do we count less than "people from outside the project"? If we > want a community-chosen logo then we should let the community choose. If > we want a logo that is good for marketing then we should find a branding > company to do it for us. > > Thanks, > Marius
I completely agree with Marius, I would also add that since this is a Community project, it should have a Community logo ! Since 16 has receive many votes now, and that I also agree with Vincent, Ludovic and others, it is not readable enough, I have made an alternative design: W-angle. My feeling was that the W is difficult to read, so my proposal try to keep the style and reworked it. There is also small changes in spacing, and a different powered by button. Here is almost all that was requested in a proposal with this variable: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16%2Dwangle%2Ddefault.png I really hope that if the logo 16 is chosen, my proposal could help in mitigating the disappointment of those that really find it unacceptable. WDYT ? Denis -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
