Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part. /Janne
On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at > least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by > Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to > run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situation > is getting worse. > > java 4086 ubuntu 10u sock 0,6 0t0 73725644 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 59u sock 0,6 0t0 77721715 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 96u sock 0,6 0t0 77721057 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 108u sock 0,6 0t0 77723538 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 119u sock 0,6 0t0 77722327 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 132u sock 0,6 0t0 77724248 > can't identify protocol > java 4086 ubuntu 134u sock 0,6 0t0 77723129 > can't identify protocol > > > /Janne > > On 21 Jan 2012, at 23:19, Mike Wertheim wrote: > >> The change log for Tomcat 7.0.25 contains this entry: >> "Correct error in fix for 49683. (markt)" >> >> Is this bug fix expected to fix the file descriptor leak that was >> reported in Tomcat 7.0.23? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
