Hi Konstantin,

You previously said:
>The spec says about HttpServletResponse.
>isCommitted(), but your valve is calling
>org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.isCommitted().

But org.apache.catalina.connector.Response implements HttpServletResponse.
Don't you think it should conform with the spec (HttpServletResponse API)
then?


Thanks and Best Regards,
Polina


On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Polina Genova <polina.gen...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for the answer, Konstantin,
>
> Actually I was referring to the HttpServletResponse interface simply
> because org.apache.catalina.connector.
> Response implements it and I would expect that its isCommited()
> implementation complies with it just like ResponseFacade's one does.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> Polina
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Konstantin Kolinko <
> knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/23 Polina Genova <polina.gen...@gmail.com>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I accidentally noticed that in valves response.isCommitted()  returns
>> false
>> > after sendRedirect() is called.
>> > According to the HttpServletResponse API (and Servlet Specification
>> v.2.5)
>> > after sendRedirect() is called the response should be considered
>> committed
>> > so I believe isCommitted() should return true in this case, shouldn't
>> it?
>> > Reproducible on Tomcat 6.35.
>> >
>> > To reproduce this, you may use the attached test materials:
>> >            - test dummy valve
>> >            - simple test app with 2 jsps (test.jsp redirects to
>> index.jsp).
>> >
>>
>> The spec says about HttpServletResponse.isCommitted(), but your valve is
>> calling
>> org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.isCommitted().
>>
>> Those are different methods.
>>
>> See o.a.c.connector.ResponseFacade#isCommitted() and
>> Response.isAppCommitted().
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Konstantin Kolinko
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to