On 08/12/2011 15:04, Jacob Champlin wrote:
>> Add a Realm definition or wait until 7.0.24.  There's a bug in 7.0.23.
> 
> I am waiting for 7.0.24.
> 
>> I'm wincing as I ask: is there a particular reason that you're defining
>> the Context in server.xml - it's been strongly recommended to not do
>> that for quite a while.
> 
> Okay, I will byte.

Pun intended?


p


> Practical:  This was my sandbox config file.  I switch between 6
> different applications.  I do this by switching server.xml files when I
> switch projects.  This keeps things minimal (not starting up 6
> connection pools), its easier to switch one file, and it makes restarts
> faster.
> 
> Opinion:  I hate over decomposition and I preferred the days when tomcat
> was only configured with server.xml.  Tomcat's configuration is not that
> complicated, do we really need a bunch of configuration files.  Its bad
> when one thing becomes two, and hence good when two things become one. I
> bet your also in the micro kernel camp.  I know lots of people clamored
> for being able to configure the connection pool in there war file.  I
> don't know why anyone would do this, our WAR file runs in any
> environment where the jndi name is present.  They have to build separate
> WAR files for each environment.  Basicly I think the context.xml is
> stupid.  If it matters so much change the document definition.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


-- 

[key:62590808]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to