On 15/11/2011 15:00, Jeffrey Janner wrote: > Alexander - > From reading your emails, it sounds like you have the following setup > > F5 HW-balancer > | > / \ > / \ Level 1 balancing > / \ > HTTPD1 HTTPD2 > | | > ---------------- Level 2 balancing > | | | > TC1 TC2 TC3 > > Is that correct? > You state that you want to eliminate Level 2. > However, from a performance standpoint, why would you? Without the Level 2 > balancing, it is conceivable that one of the 3 Tomcats could end up > processing the bulk the JSP requests.
Why? p > However, Pid is correct. If you are worried about performance, you could drop > the HTTPD servers and balance directly to the Tomcat servers. Tomcat is just > as fast at delivering static content as HTTPD, and it simplifies deployment. > > Jeff > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexander Diedler [mailto:adied...@tecracer.de] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:56 AM >> To: Tomcat Users List; p...@pidster.com >> Subject: AW: mod_jk Avoid loadbalancing >> >> Hello, >> Yes, it was an option to solve my problem. But what about the >> performance? >> My opinion was to forward only necessary requests to the Tomcat (jsp, >> java >> etc) and let the Apache HTTPD deliver the static content (CSS,JS,Images >> etc). >> >> Best regards >> Alexander >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2011 12:41 >> An: Tomcat Users List >> Betreff: Re: mod_jk Avoid loadbalancing >> >> On 14/11/2011 10:42, Alexander Diedler wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> >>> >>> It is possible in a three node TC 6.0 / TC7.0 Cluster to avoid the >>> loadbalancing between these three nodes? We only need the session >>> replication. The Loadbalancing with failover will be done by a Big-IP >>> F5, so we don´t need a "double" balanced request, first time by the >>> HW-balancer and second time by the Apache mod_jk himself. >> >> So don't put httpd+mod_jk in front - just point the F5 at the Tomcats. >> >> >> p >> >> >> -- >> >> [key:62590808] > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice: This Transmission (including any attachments) may > contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from > disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the > intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to > the sender or telephone (512) 343-9100 and delete this transmission from your > system. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > -- [key:62590808]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
