On 6/27/2011 9:56 AM, Michal Singer wrote:
This is the error I get:
wget http://172.18.206.103/bundles/vacc-AOS701b318-fl.tgz
--08:27:06-- http://172.18.206.103/bundles/vacc-AOS701b318-fl.tgz
=> `vacc-AOS701b318-fl.tgz.1'
Connecting to 172.18.206.103:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 551,188,433 (526M)
0% [
] 0 --.--K/s
08:27:06 (0.00 B/s) - Connection closed at byte 0. Retrying.
This error is on the client side, on the tomcat logs, I don't see any errors.
I am using large files between 100MB to 500 MB.
When I asked about how heavy the http, I meant compared for ftp for example. I
read somewhere that:
"Tomcat is often considered to be too slow to serve static content"
Is this correct?
As I understand it, at one time (before I was using Tomcat regularly),
Tomcat was noticeably slower than (for example) httpd for serving static
files, but that is no longer true.
However, http is always going to have more overhead than ftp for data
transfers, so you might some gain by switching to the ftp protocol for
large transfers.
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
