On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Christopher Schultz wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert,
>
> On 4/1/2011 1:13 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> >> So... it specifically tells you that it will use your own
> >> conf/server.xml file. Would you like an additional reinforcing statement?
> >
> > Why, yes, thanks for asking so politely. :-)  because if you read
> > further down in that RUNNING.txt file, you see:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > now correct me if i'm wrong, but since we just established that you
> > need to reassign more than just the main (8080) server port, to then
> > subsequently claim that all you need to do to avoid a conflict is to
> > reassign the main (8080) server port would be incorrect, would it not?
>
> That's just the most common problem: since servers /other/ than Tomcat
> often bind to port 8080, Tomcat may interfere with some other non-Tomcat
> process. You're point is valid, though: there are many potentially
> conflicting port numbers in server.xml.
>
> Patches, even for documentation, are always welcome...

  as i'm still working my way thru the docs, i don't think i'm ready
to start submitting patches just yet.  give me a few days ...

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to