-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark,
On 3/4/2011 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/03/2011 09:05, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Based on what I have seen so far it looks to be a valid issue. I have a >> very rough patch that addresses the bulk of the problem but there is >> some unexpected behaviour still to be resolved. Today's task is writing >> some unit tests, getting my head around exactly what needs to be done >> and refining the patch. >> >> I'd like to make statement regarding time-scales but the last time I hit >> what on the surface looked like a simple bug it took a month of >> refactoring to fix it. I don't think this is going to take anywhere near >> that long but until the full extent of the required changes is >> understood, it would be foolish to speculate about time-scales. > > I believe this is now fixed. I'm running the unit tests now followed by > the Servlet TCK. Assuming everything passes, I'll start the 7.0.10 > release process later today. Given that previous releases have passed the TCK, does that mean that the TCK lacks testing of this particular feature of Servlet 3.0? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1xS0EACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAkqACfbP0zgqvgm2zmsApVzO8hUXTJ RUYAn00svPJiX0hRoO6bDgxU1x8vlcjY =DhBR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
