Original: Does this happen all the time? Under what conditions? Are you able to build a patched version of Tomcat in a test environment to test a fix I have? What version of Java and Tomcat are you running?
Hey I'm not sure if you refer the question to me, since the whole topic shifted to an off topic :] But yes, it happens all the time. what do you mean "under what conditions?" As I specified in my first mail, it happens when I implement windows authentication on tomcat I use tomcat 6.0.29 , on OS win server 2008 R2 standard, JDK 1.6 Build 23 If you have a fix, I'll happy to try it on our test environment. Thanks Hila 2011/2/25 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > André, > > On 2/25/2011 10:47 AM, André Warnier wrote: > > [Thread hijacking] is more annoying, because quite a few people have > their client set > > to display messages "by thread" (a hierarchical display where messages > > neatly appear under the ones they respond to, instead of just > > chronologically). The client classifies new messages as being "part of > > a thread" using information contained in other headers within the > > message (kind of a "refers to" thing). These headers are automatically > > added by the list server. > > So when you respond to an existing message and change the subject, for > > these people an unrelated message suddenly appears inside a discussion > > "tree" where your new message does not belong. > > Worse are mail clients who think that "subject" and "thread" are > interchangeable: the thread-id in the SMTP headers is ignored and > instead the subject is used to thread things. That way, two things happen: > > 1. People who hijack threads can't tell and get all angry when we tell > them they hijacked the thread > > 2. Legitimate thread-subject-changes (such as adding [OT] or whatever) > end up showing-up in what looks like a separate thread. > > > Please do [chip in]. That's the point of this list. > > Specially interventions like yours, which is civil, well-written and > > brings valuable information and insights. > > Mostly everyone here will ignore most of the list-etiquette rules and > remain civil if you have something worthwhile to say. Top-posting is > only irritating when it looks like this: > > Reply: > > Yes, no, and maybe. There are other times this happens. 1.6. 5.something. > > Original: > Does this happen all the time? Under what conditions? Are you able to > build a patched version of Tomcat in a test environment to test a fix I > have? What version of Java and Tomcat are you running? > > Since Chris's post had actual content and didn't really have a > point-counterpoint feel to it, top-posting can be forgiven :) > > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1n8uwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDHNQCfXscF1JWtPIXeu3DMzLgFbg/A > CmYAnA/117/lOPYzoKPvU9DOX29BeEFS > =Xzcc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
