On 15/12/2010 14:48, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: > thanks. I just might :) I can probably find it on Google, but would you > happen to have the url for the jsr-315 spec?
You can grab it from http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315 Mark > I still find it incredible > that a 15 year mature unix-originating project in 2010 would still be > demanding CPM/MSDOS filename extensions and not simply using the standard > regex library, or that java servers should be constrained not allow a > hierarchical address space to a universal resource simply because the active > agent in the URI happened to be a script - the supplier of a resource in a > REST environment should be invisible to the resource requester imho, however > it is built under the surface of the request, I think it should just be > /a/path/on/the/web and not a?subject=path&relation=on&article=the&object=web > :) > > but yeah, I should take that up with them. > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 15/12/2010 14:03, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Go read the spec. The JSP Servlet is mapped *based on file extension* >> not >>>> path. >>> >>> >>> heh, how very quaint. Where did they get this idea? from MSDOS? Oh >> never >>> mind. I don't think I want to know, and I suppose I just should be happy >>> the names aren't constrained to 8 ascii chars. >> >> If you want to lobby the Servlet Expert group to modify the mapping >> rules to support more flexible mapping then the place to send your >> comments is jsr-315-comme...@jcp.org >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
