-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ajay,
On 11/23/2010 4:15 PM, Aggarwal, Ajay wrote: > I am little reluctant to use HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() for > couple of reasons: > > 1) I don't know ahead of time how long these operations will take. So > I don't have a good value to set the MaxInactiveInterval to. That will certainly be problematic. > 2) I need to design for my clients crashing or losing connectivity > with me. So I can't use a negative value either (i.e. never > expires). That makes sense. Have you considered an asynchronous response model? Perhaps a single HTTP request-response isn't the best way to implement your service. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzsM6YACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAJvwCfRGloFQ8aTNSvwHjML8MTk9f/ fnwAn2ITyT6iACIaV3WaH3V4f+awX210 =770y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
