On 18/11/2010 16:54, Rob Gregory wrote:
> Spot on Mark. 
> 
> I have been googling and playing around for over a day on this, Following 
> your suggestion it boils down to a couple of lines of code:-
> 
> StandardServer server = (StandardServer) ServerFactory.getServer();
> Context context = server.getGlobalNamingContext();
> context.bind(dataSourceName, datasource);
> 
> Thanks again for the push in the right direction.

No problem. Just be aware ServerFactory is gone in 7.0.x.

Mark

> 
> Rob
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Sent: 18 November 2010 10:30
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: Dynamic GlobalNamingResources / Shared JDBC connection pools
>>
>> On 18/11/2010 09:34, Rob Gregory wrote:
>>> Thanks Chris,
>>>
>>> After messing around with JNDI yesterday I came to the same conclusion that
>> Tomcat is doing some isolation
>>
>> Random thoughts that may or may not help.
>>
>> If you look in the DataSourceRealm you will see some code that lets a
>> web-app use a DataSource from either webapp JNDI or global JNDI. That
>> might give you some pointers.
>>
>> Also, I'm pretty sure there is some write protection applied to the
>> global JNDI somewhere. That might also get in your way.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to