-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

All,

On 10/14/2010 3:24 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
> 
> On 10/14/2010 3:21 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 14/10/2010 20:03, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
>>> Hi Pid,
>>>
>>> Am Thursday 14 October 2010 schrieb Pid:
>>>> Which JSTL implementation are you using and which Java version was it
>>>> compiled for/on?
>>>
>>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/javax/servlet/jstl/1.2/jstl-1.2.jar
>>>
>>> Using Sun/Oracle Java 6u21
> 
>> OK.
> 
>> The related sources jar was built in 2006, and the pom for that
>> indicates that it's dependent on JSP 2.0, rather than 2.1.
> 
>> At a guess, JSTL doesn't know what an enum is, so it's just doing what
>> it would do for any other unknown Object subclass, and is calling the
>> .toString() method.
> 
> Something I didn't bother asking: what does the default Enum.toString
> return?

Answer to my own question:

public class EnumTest
{
  public enum Weekday {
    SUNDAY, MONDAY, TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY
  }

  public static void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println(Weekday.SUNDAY);
  }
}

This produces "SUNDAY" as output.

The EnumTest.Weekday "class" doesn't override the toString method,
allowing java.lang.Enum (it's superclass) to handle that.

java.lang.Enum.toString is implemented like this:

public String toString()
{
  return name;
}

... and "name" is a String which is initialized in the constructor (when
I decompile EnumTest.Weekday, I can see it uses the string "Sunday", as
one might expect).

So I'm surprised that Oliver is getting that weird output.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAky3Wn4ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PB1yACeKEbeavY+ois6H2BMndqRLWsm
CxEAn0SsiuLsvv6O/Szd3QKsPZ66Mxgj
=bQGI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to