I haven't done any benchmarks, and I'm assuming some of the folks on this thread are the Tomcat developers and can speak first hand to the speed. If so, I would encourage you to update the wiki ...
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Connectors because it mentions that Apache is faster at serving static content than Tomcat for high-traffic sites. - Dave Jeff Hubbs-2 wrote: > > On 10/14/10 12:08 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to make sure Tomcat is not serving static >>> files that Apache can serve more efficiently. >> Why do you think httpd can serve them more efficiently? > I recall from reading about Slashdot's architecture some years ago > (Perl/MySQL at the time) that they had separate servers running Tux for > static content... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Where-do-files-served-get-logged--tp29963979p29964522.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
