On 13/10/2010 19:14, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Mark, > > On 10/12/2010 5:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 12/10/2010 19:45, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> markt marked this bug as FIXED, but I see no indication of a resolution. >>> Perhaps that was meant to be WONTFIX? > >> Nope. I meant FIXED. As in "There is now an option you can use to >> disable this behaviour if you don't like it". > > Gotcha. It wasn't clear from the comment that the fix was somewhat of a > workaround. > > Any reason those buffers never release their memory?
I believe performance. > Was the complexity > of the proposed fix deemed too high for the rare cases where this > problem occurs (that is, shoddy JSPs)? I believe so but to be honest I haven't looked at the proposed fix for quite some time. > Finally, is this same technique > used in Tomcat 6.x and is the same workaround available? 6.0.x and 7.0.x. Same workaround. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
