On 9/16/2010 2:36 PM, André Warnier wrote:
David kerber wrote:
On 9/16/2010 12:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 9/16/2010 11:32 AM, André Warnier wrote:
The load average is not particularly impressive however. One could
almost suspect that you keep this machine coddled away from any real
network, just for the purpose of boasting about its uptime.
You're right, it's not. I don't know what my version of 'uptime' does
with threads to compute load average, though. Also, my webapps are not
typically CPU-bound: they're I/O bound -- lots of database activity and
socket (HTTP) communication. So, I don't expect my load averages to get
very high.
P.S. Unfortunately I just scanned ours, and I can't produce much better
in terms of load average. What a waste of CPU power...
Maybe run s...@home on your servers? Better yet, virtualize everything
on one huge box and pray for no hardware failures.
Our longest-running Tomcat-running machine shows 261 days.
That's respectable. I'll send your server a birthday present in
January :)
That's roughly what I've had for my longest-running instances, before
I rebooted the server to do Windows security updates.
I think that you deserve a handicap; for Windows servers, uptime counts
double. So you`re getting close to Christopher's.
Yeah, but I cheat by using Windows 2000 Server (the best version of
Windows ever released, IMO). It's also a really simple TC application,
but I keep it busy (I get ~2.5 million transactions per day on one
instance, and another 1.5M on another instance on the same machine).
D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
