On 07.09.2010 17:04, Brett Delle Grazie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 11:15 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 09/07/2010 11:02 AM, Amol Puglia wrote:
Hello Team,
Below are the details of workers.properties file and httpd.conf file.
# lists the workers by name
worker.list=tomcat1, tomcat2, tomcat3, loadbalancer
This should be
worker.list=loadbalancer
Note that workers that constitute load balancer must
not appear in the worker.list
May I ask what might happen if they were?
For example, I have two separate vhosts, one which uses the balancer and
one (for jk-manager access) which does not, both use sticky sessions -
would this cause problems with the balancer code?
No. It might only confuse people reading the config wondering which of
it is used. As long as you get your JkMount right, mod_jk uses the
worker you expect.
No idea, what your vhosts have to do with putting the above mentioned
ajp workers (tomcat1 etc.) into worker.list though. A vhost for
jk-manager access only needs to use one worker, namely a worker of type
status. That one needs to be put into the worker.list.
BTW: version 1.2.30 contains a nice default configuration in its source
download tarball. It shows using load balancer and status worker fer
example.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
