On 21/08/2010 20:13, Ken Fox wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Pid * <p...@pidster.com> wrote: >> We don't usually count web traffic in hits any more, because a single >> page could easily cause 100 hits. > > I think hits to your app servers is still an appropriate way to think > about your server load. If a page view generates 100 hits to your > Tomcat instances, your CDN is probably busted.
A CDN is somewhat of an assumption, in this case, I think. > Marketing and ad revenue talk a lot about page views, but that's > a useless stat for sizing your Tomcat servers. Don't give in to the > dark side. ;) I disagree. Pages, forms, Servlets are far more likely to account for server load than static files. Regardless, an average of one *hit* per minute could easily mean a mere 1 *page* an hour. > On a related topic, anybody have trouble scaling Comet-based > sites with Tomcat? It seems like ad revenue could be at least as > big a hurdle as server scaling. That would be off-topic for this thread. p > - Ken > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
