Thanks folks, I submitted the issue as a bug: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779
Hans 2010/8/19 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Pid/Hans, > > On 8/16/2010 5:53 AM, Pid wrote: >> On 16/08/2010 09:52, Hans Wahn wrote: >>> I'd like to provide more information. Any suggestions what is the best >>> way to accomplish that? >> >> See above, regarding trace log. >> >> Also, providing a stack trace if there is one from the error log and any >> access log data. >> >> You might consider *not* sending the 100 header and just proceeding as >> normal. > > Also, can you try your tests against a similarly-configured Tomcat > 6.0.29 instance? It may be that some code has changed in Tomcat 7 and > some regression occurred. > > Especially if you have a super-simple test case (and it looks like you > do: you have an automated client that makes a limited and deterministic > set of requests, and you can probably whip-together a skeleton webapp > that behaves badly on command), you should probably file this as a bug > and submit everything you've got: HTTP conversation logs, the example > webapp, and the automated client. You'd be amazed how fast a > reproducable bug can be fixed ;) > > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxsrQUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDeOACfR5A4AkbA5JxEX5zihfSAL9BS > c4kAnRQB0BT8N8jUO65Oniq0y1e0QGB5 > =6gqR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
