On 02.07.2010 02:37, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rainer,
On 7/1/2010 4:54 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Usually mod_rewrite is perfectly compatible with mod_jk. I must confess,
that I'm not 100% sure about the case, where you try to rewrite a
request that originally would have been handled by mod_jk to something
that should not be handled by it.
It appears that my setup (rewriting a request that normally would go to
jk to one that shouldn't go to jk) still ends up being handled by jk.
Two possibilities: if it doesn't actually work, you can set the env var
"no-jk" as a side effect in your rewrite rule. If mod_jk fins this env
var set, it will decline to handle the request. Alternatively, if you
are fine with redirecting by mod_rewrite instead of rewriting
internally, the redirecting should also win over mod_jk.
Okay, I changed my RewriteRule to this:
RewriteRule .* /bad-browser.shtml [L,E=no-jk]
OK, I did a little test:
RewriteRule .* /bad-browser.shtml [L,E=no-jk:1]
should work. A quick glance at mod_rewrite's code indicates it drops E=
rules when no value is present.
Have fun!
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
