2010/4/30 André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com>: > Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> >> 2010/4/29 Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>: >>> >>> I was just looking on the TC site to see what minimum Java version is >>> required for TC 6. I just assumed that it would be there because, >>> whenever that question is asked on the list, a snippy response usually >>> follows it. >> >> I know of the following places where it is written: >> >> 1. README.html, >> that is linked from the Download page, and that is also displayed when >> you browse the download area, >> http://tomcat.apache.org/download-60.cgi >> -> "Please see the README" >> >> 2. RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> that is linked from many places, including the above mentioned README, >> the documentation, and also included in every download bundle. >> >> 3. RUNNING.txt >> that is included into distributions as well. >> >> Anything else is needed? >> >
> Putting it in a file which you get only after you have downloaded Tomcat > seems to me .. unfair. All the above mentioned files are accessible online. Maybe the "Please see the README file" phrase on the download page can be tweaked a bit. > unfair. Requiring to read documentation before running a product is "unfair" ? All the files that you have to read first do contain that information. Maybe we can adjust some wording and some headers to be more clear, though. > On 4/29/2010 5:20 PM, André Warnier wrote: > > Suggestion : in the little table at the top of the "which version?" > > page, add a column with the minimum Java version required. > > +1 > If anybody wants to provide a patch, the file is /site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
