Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > > you're wrong, I believe it is > > chunk-header:blabla<CRLF> > chunk-data<CRLF> > > The spec says > > chunk = chunk-size [ chunk-extension ] CRLF > chunk-data CRLF > > > Hence, the request that was posted here, should have been 16bytes > header, not 18
Whoops - you are correct. Somehow I overlooked that second "CRLF" when I checked 3.1.6. I should have checked an implementation and not just the spec... (The CRLF after chunk-data exists mostly to make any optional trailers easier to read, presumably.) So yes, the chunk-size in the posted request was wrong. -- Michael Wojcik Micro Focus Rhetoric & Writing, Michigan State University --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org