On 25/03/2010 01:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion.
> 
> That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers.

What did you think was odd?

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to