André Warnier wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> Barry Kimelman wrote: > ... > >> >> This is a 'feature' of newer versions of Java where the required dlls >> aren't placed where they are meant to be. I believe there is a fix in >> the works in commons-daemon to try and work around this. More details >> (including background and workarounds) can be found in the associated >> JIRA. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-110 >> > I stand corrected thus. Please ignore my previous answer about the > 64-bit tomcatX.exe. Things seem to have moved ahead while I was on > holiday..
Maybe, maybe not. Looking again at the log message it does look more like a 64-bit issue rather than the JVM issue. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
