I think you can achieve something simular just using longer timeouts on
mod_jk
one of those:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html
* use_server_errors*
And use ErrorDocument in apache for custom error page
Evgeny

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Dhiraj Rajput <
draj...@premiertechnologygroup.com> wrote:

> Hi Rainer,
>
> Yes , it support to the 1.29 mod jk.
>
> But here issue is different, I am using the JDBC store for the clustering.
>
> Suppose my application is running fine and that instant if node1 is goes
> offline
>
> It need near about 10 - 20 sec to push the session in to DB and in between
> these 10 sec I f I try to do anything in my application , the application
> kick back me on login page.
>
> To overcome from this login page issue I am thinking to use the redirect
> parameter for two nodes.
>
> In this case , can you please tell me wheather this is sutaible and how it
> works.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 11:28 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: redirect paramter in the jk_workers file
>
> Your mailer uses a very unfriendly way of formatting your messages. So I
> do top posting.
>
> Yes, as you can read on
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
>
> the atribute redirect is supported since version 1.2.9. For a two node
> load balancer, you don't need it though. If you have many nodes in a
> load balancer, the redirect expresses, which one you prefer for the
> failover. If you dont specify it, the load balancer will use some other
> working node according to its load values.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
>
>
> On 02.09.2009 06:51, Dhiraj Rajput wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have below mention tag in my jk workers file.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > orker.tomcat.type=lb
> >
> > worker.tomcat.socket_keepalive=1
> >
> > worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=300
> >
> > worker.tomcat.connection_pool_size=50
> >
> > worker.tomcat.connection_pool_timeout=600
> >
> > worker.tomcat.balance_workers=tomcatnode1,tomcatnode2
> >
> > worker.tomcat.sticky_session=true
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.port=9732
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.host=10.18.25.160
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.type=ajp13
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.socket_keepalive=True
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.socket_timeout=300
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.connection_pool_timeout=600
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.connect_timeout=600
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode1.redirect=tomcatnode2
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.port=9733
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.host=10.18.25.107
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.type=ajp13
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.socket_keepalive=True
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.socket_timeout=300
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.connection_pool_timeout=600
> >
> > worker.tomcatnode2.redirect=tomcatnode1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I am not 100% sure how this works and is it really usefull for the
> failover.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Dhiraj V Rajput
> >
> > Associate System Admin
> >
> > Hosting Services Group
> >
> > Premier Technology Group Nagpur
>
> >
> > Phone: - USA- 1-626-698-1099
> >
> > India Office: 91-712-2446734 ext 30
> >
> > cell no : 91-9370315811
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 11:22 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: redirect paramter in the jk_workers file
> >
> >
> >
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> > Dhiraj,
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/27/2009 8:26 AM, Dhiraj Rajput wrote:
> >
> >> I have issue on the redirect tag in jk workers file.
> >
> >
> >
> > What is "redirect tag"?
> >
> >
> >
> > -chris
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to