> From: Ossi [mailto:los...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 clustering and engine's defaulthost > > > Problem occurred when we had in server 1: > <Engine name="Catalina" defaultHost="private-tomcat1" > jvmRoute="route1"> > and in server 2: > <Engine name="Catalina" defaultHost="private-tomcat2" > jvmRoute="route2">
Fragments of server.xml aren't helping; post the *complete* server.xml. > So, maybe my question is that is there any harm if I use random, > non-existing names as defaultHost for Engine? Yes - as Pid pointed out, it's in direct contradiction to the config requirements in the Tomcat doc, so no rational behavior is guaranteed if you violate that. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
