Christopher Schultz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
On 5/21/2009 12:34 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
hi Christopher, generally, ulimit -n 1024 is too low for any kind of web
server.
Fair enough, but I'm not putting an unreasonable load on my server with
ulimit -n 1024 and 40 concurrent connections, am I?
And there was also a file descriptor leak in the NIO connector, fixed in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=734454&view=rev
this is when Tomcat NIO serves up static content.
Yup, I'm only serving up static content (using sendfile in the first
test that failed to complete, and NOT using sendfile in the second one
which completed with c=1 but failed on c=40).
Is tcnative trunk stable enough to just try using that?
The commit comment says "NIO fixes"... nothing more specific? ;)
if you look at the commit, there are changelog changes in there. one of
them being a FD leak with static content.
It simply never called close on the FD when it was done
Filip
Thanks,
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkoWofMACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBGnACgjDwmquIeUv1FfeCYKQHEx2HZ
s9AAn2UYoLK2J3exkh1Q0h8Wt8A0rJSa
=8tQI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org