Hi.
Re : http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/uriworkermap.html
While perusing the above document, it occurs to me that the following
paragraph is a bit ambiguous :
quote
Virtual host integration
IIS
When using IIS you can restrict individual rules to special
virtual hosts by prefixing the URI pattern with the virtual host
information. The rules is that the url must be prefixed with the host name.
etc...
unquote
Are we talking about Virtual Hosts as defined in the front-end IIS
server, or about Virtual Hosts (aka <Host ..>) in the backend server ?
If we are talking about virtual hosts in the front-end IIS server, then
the example which follows seems a bit useless :
# Use www.foo.org as virtual host
/www.foo.org/myapp/*=myworker
# Use www.bar.org as virtual host
/www.bar.org/myapp/*=myworker
# Normal mapping
/mysecondapp/*=myworker
(since we are mapping everything to worker "myworker" anyway.)
Would this not be better ?
# Request to /myapp from virtual host www.foo.org go to worker-foo
/www.foo.org/myapp/*=worker-foo
# Request to /myapp from virtual host www.bar.org go to worker-bar
/www.bar.org/myapp/*=worker-bar
# Normal mapping
/mysecondapp/*=myworker
Or am I understanding this the wrong way around ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
