Jason Smith wrote: > Just Tomcat, no proxy. > > And I agree, that isn't the way you'd want to fix it ultimately, but I was > experimenting to find out what worked. You'd ultimately like to not see the > '0' at the beginning of the buffer. I found the place where it was getting > copied to the beginning of the buffer, but I can't figure out the logic > behind the code. Too many micro opts (it's fast!). > > What did NOT work was simply subverting the copying of the data and setting > the buffer length to 0, as is normally the case. There are apparently some > instances where .nextRequest must copy the data from one buffer to the next. > I tried. Things didn't work so well after that... :-) I mentioned one of > those in the previous email. > > But again, I am not yet familiar with this part of the Tomcat code. So I am > probably missing something fairly obvious.
So, how about some simple code to demonstrate the problem? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
