-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt,
On 3/20/2009 9:10 AM, Matt Brown wrote: > Actually yes, in our case the image content is not already > sufficiently compressed by the content provider - we're seeing a > sizeable decrease in the size of the images delivered after enabling > gzip on them. You may be able to re-code some of these graphics using higher compression (better results with PNG) or lower quality (for JPG) though lower quality will always be... lower quality. Interesting that gzip does a good job with these files. Can you give some metrics? I'd be interested to see how well it does. Is this for a mobile application? Or are you just trying to reduce bandwidth use in general? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAknDpScACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDjMwCeMdwZw7SzUVH6YXjkAkzzECu8 Mg4AnRyjK+WCorIkVCFcCyFMFKhnZByW =+4e5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
