Hi Rainer,

your comment about the watchdog sounds interesting.  When you load balance
it would seem useful to get feedback from Tomcat itself about its load so
that the module can adjust dynamically its load (lbfactor) based on the
Tomcat's performance rather than a session/socket count. One can wonder if
such added complexity would be detrimental to the mod_jk stability.

Rgds - Fred


Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> 
> On 06.02.2009 18:23, André Warnier wrote:
>> gerhardus.geldenh...@gta-travel.com wrote:
>>>> 1) As far as I know, no, mod_jk does not read workers.properties
>>>> dynamically.
>>>> 2) Yes and no, it will not send a request unless communication has
>>> been
>>>> established with the worker, it may happen that the worker fails, or
>>>> someone shut it down. Depending on how you configure the workers and
>>>> the
>>>> number of workers, it can retry the request and/or try a different
>>>> worker. Mod_jk will mark the worker on error when it does not respond,
>>>> and it will try again after a configurable time -but it tries again
>>>> with
>>>> an actual request-.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It would be really nice if you could test availability of a node with a
>>> configurable request instead of a live production request... (hint,
>>> hint)
>>>
>> Isn't that what "ping" is about ?
> 
> Ping tests, whether there is something able to still process AJP on the 
> other side of the connection. A configurable request would be able to 
> talk to the application, so one could detect, whether it is still 
> deployed, and if the request would be handled by an intelligent servlet 
> it could respond with some sort of application layer health status.
> 
> Worth filing an enhancement request, since Mladen put the Watchdog 
> thread into 1.2.27, we can easily add more logic of that type.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rainer
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-tp21856049p21878692.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to