I decided to dig through the source code myself as well and also found that this is the case, so thanks. Not exactly sure why they subclassed this without inheriting any of that functionality.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > >> From: CameronL >> Subject: ExtendedAccessLogValve pattern? >> >> Can you not mix the different field patterns like this? > > A quick look at the code says you can't - you have to use the W3c fields, > as documented here: > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/api/org/apache/catalina/valves/ExtendedAccessLogValve.html > > - Chuck > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail > and its attachments from all computers. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ExtendedAccessLogValve-pattern--tp21802341p21813587.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
