same applies on Firefox though, there may well be issues in IE as always but i'm not convinced this is the core problem here.
Gregor Schneider wrote: > > Bill, > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The article is referring to the fact that Tomcat adds cache headers by >> default to any page protected by a <security-constraint> to prevent >> someone >> else from stealing it from an intermediate proxy. The default settings >> are >> extremely aggressive, resulting in regular posts on this list of the form >> "My secured pdf file can't be displayed in IE". > > If you read on in those articles, you'll find that this is not a > problem due to headers send by Tomcat but due to a bug with the > SSL-implementation in IE > > http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B323308&x=11&y=11 > > There are some workarounds for this problem (if you don't want users > to patch their registry), which require a modification of the headers > being sent, however, I believe you're mixing up the cause of this > problem (= bug in IE) with a possible workaround (header-modification > by Tomcat). > > Cheers > > Gregor > -- > just because your paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you... > gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 > gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-caching-of-static-resources--tp20932874p20954165.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
