On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Sean Carolan wrote:
> Hello Tomcat users:
>
> I need some help replacing the functionality of mod_jserv with mod_jk.

Hello Sean,

if you have to go through this, I suggest you to take a look at mod_proxy_ajp 
of apache 2.2. It can itself replace mod_jk, and in my project (2 opencms 
servers with an apache2.2 in front for static content) seemed to be the most 
seamless and proper.

regards,
Yves


>  Here is the situation:
>
> We have a legacy web-based java application that uses mod_jserv with
> load balancing. Typically there are one or more Apache servers with
> two java servers on the back-end.  We also have Apache set up to
> listen on individual ports so that we can monitor each java server
> separately.  Here is an example from one of the Apache config files:
>
> <VirtualHost 10.100.1.53:81>
>
> ---extra config stuff here---
>
> # App server configuration
> <IfModule mod_jserv.c>
>     ApJServMount /servlets ajpv12://host.domain.com:8008/root
>     ApjServAction .html /servlets/gnujsp
> </IfModule>
>
> What I would like to do is set up an instance of Apache on
> host.domain.com itself, just for the purpose of monitoring the health
> of the java process on the local box.  I want it to listen on port 81
> just like the web server does.  The problem is I cannot simply use the
> same mod_jserv.so module because the app server has Apache 2 installed
> and the web server is still using Apache 1.3.  I have already spent
> several hours trying to build a new mod_jserv.so for Apache 2.0 with
> no luck.
>
> I am told that mod_jk can be used to replace mod_jserv.  I have mod_jk
> installed and the module loads fine in my Apache configuration.  Where
> I'm stuck is, how do I duplicate the above configuration on the local
> box using mod_jk?
>
> Any help you can give is *most* appreciated.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to