André Warnier wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat producing (near) duplicate Catalina logs
Then one of the Linux mangling distribution authors intervened
to explain why they were mangling and re-arranging things, and
it all made a lot of sense too.
Then get them to support the mess they create.
Seriously, throw away the 3rd-party junk and install a real Tomcat.
The mangled distributions are simply not reliable, regardless of how
well-founded the intentions are.
Ok. Maybe if we phrased the question differently then :
Hi guys,
To Tomcat developers and/or members of the "real Tomcat" fraternity :
under which circumstances /would/ Tomcat 5.5 under Linux create two
almost-identical-but-not-quite logfiles,
- one named "catalina.2008-06-12.log"
- one named "catalina_2008-06-12.log"
... just theoretically ?
Just a shot in the dark:
One of them coming from Tomcat-Logging, the other might be a redirected
STDOUT written via a service wrapper. In many log configuration,
appenders are configured in a way, that log messages go to STDOUT and a
log file in parallel. In Tomcat without a service wrapper STDOUT gets
redirected to catalina.out (no rotation by default), with a service
wrapper it might go to the duplicate log file. Didn't verify that though.
What's the difference between the two almost identical log files (I mean
difference in contents)?
And thanks for your benevolent help.
To Linux Debian Tomcat 5.5 packagers (and manglers) :
why does Tomcat 5.5 under Debian Linux Etch create two
almost-identical-but-not-quite logfiles,
- one named "catalina.2008-06-12.log"
- one named "catalina_2008-06-12.log"
huh, why ?
and where did you put the configuration snippet that tells it to do that ?
And thanks for your benevolent help.
André
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
