I don't think they are exactly the same. I had something that was not working with <jsp:include> but did for <%@ include %>.
I understand <jsp:...> this the new, XML-complaint way to do things, but there must be subtle differences in how things are being done between these 2 approaches. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Andrei Tchijov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they are identical. you will want to use <jsp:include> if you care to have > your JSP pages in form of valid XML. > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:52 , Jonathan Mast wrote: > > I'm wondering if the <%@ include file="somefile.jsp" %> method of >> including >> a file is more error prone (on Tomcat) than <jsp:include >> page="somefile.jsp" >> flush="true"/> approach? >> >> Any ideas would helpful, especially an explanation of what is being done >> under the hood when these 2 mechanisms are being invoked. >> >> Tomcat 5.5 >> Java 1.4.2 >> >> Thanks >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
