Re: [OT] Threads

[Andrew Miehs]

On 03/04/2008, at 7:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:

Alan Chaney wrote:

| 2500 threads?


output pixel its own thread. More threads = faster, right? Hoo-ray for
threads!

| Actually another question is what is it in your application that NEEDS Ooh! I know... it's a ray-tracer that goes reeeeal fast if you give each

Doh! and I thought he had 2500 processors!...

Silly me.

Andrew

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature