Mark, Do you think that little hollow voice can clarify how IPSec would solve this problem by giving an example of a software that I could implement to accomplish this?Thanks,Jim > Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:03:28 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > users@tomcat.apache.org> Subject: Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption > benefits?> > A hollow voice whispers, "IPSec".> > -- > Mark H. Wood, Lead > System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Typically when a software vendor says > that a product is "intuitive" he> means the exact opposite.>
- mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits? James Ellis
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits? Rainer Jung
- RE: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefits? James Ellis
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefi... Bill Barker
- RE: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption be... James Ellis
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encrypti... Martin Gainty
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encr... David Rees
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption benefi... Mark H. Wood
- RE: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encryption be... James Ellis
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encrypti... David Rees
- Re: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp - encr... David Cassidy