Hi,
I recall that I had to use OCI drivers because the THIN driver did
not support XML DB capabilites. Is that still true today?
cheers,
--
--
:: Breno Jacinto ::
:: breno - at - gprt.ufpe.br ::
:: FingerPrint ::
2F15 8A61 F566 E442 8581
E3C0 EFF4 E202 74B7 7484
:: Persistir no difícil é a única maneira de torná-lo fácil algum dia. ::
2007/12/4, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We evaluated OCI driver ourselves and found that it has only one benefit
> - external OPS$ account support. Otherwise THIN driver requires less
> maintenance, less installation and it is often faster, because it brings
> some datatypes inline (LONG, if I am not mistaken).
>
> - Alexey.
>
> Rumpa Giri wrote:
> > For production environment it has been recommended that we use OCI
> > driver.
> >
> > Based on the oracle JDBC guide, with oracle 10g there is not much
> > difference in the two drivers in terms of capability.
> >
> > We would like to know is there any documentation/links/whitepapers on
> > the above? Is there any data proving that OCI performs better than THIN
> > driver?
> >
> > What are you using for your production JDBC driver? Have you had a
> > chance to compare the two before making the decision?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rumpa Giri
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
> > it now.
> >
> >
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Alexey N. Solofnenko <http://trelony.cjb.net/>
> Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
