We do it because the IIS is already active on the existing server and it
is running a bunch of other stuff we don't want to stop (eg MS Exchange).
So we cannot have tomcat take over handling port 80 requests. It works
fine, though.
Roger
Jacob Rhoden wrote:
Propes, Barry L wrote:
there's lots of people who combine the two -- I currently am, because
our UNIX support group has not made the environment compatible for or
with Tomcat!
Sounds like you and I have the same employer (: But seriously, I am
trying to work out the pro's and cons of standalone mode. I am
wondering why you put IIS in front of tomcat? Does IIS provide other
services apart from tomcat, or is there a specific reason?
Best Regards,
Jacob
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
