-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Neil,

Neil Wilson wrote:
> Unfortunately I can't really upgrade it as it may break the rest of
> Scalix if it depends on this current version.

Okay. Sometimes this just happens ;)

I get what looks like the same error you do when I start up mod_jk:

[Wed Oct 24 03:10:04.000 2007] [2660:3083335872] [error]
init_jk::mod_jk.c (2732): Initializing
shm:/usr/lib/apache2/logs/jk-runtime-status.2660 errno=2. Load balancing
workers will not function properly.

My error message looks a lot less nasty, though. Perhaps they changed
the language because the error looks worse than it is (note that it's
the same errno: 2 (No such file or directory).

> I've commented out all of the other options you mentioned that are
> depreciated, and tried restarting and it's still doing the same thing.

Well, you might not want to comment them out entirely -- maybe just
read-up on their replacements and set the values accordingly. Of course,
you don't need the lb stuff if you're not doing load balancing.

> I've also tried removing and re-installing from the original RPMs that
> come with Scalix, and this hasn't helped either.

:(

> What's strange is my apache is listening on port 80 on all interfaces...
> 
> tcp        0      0 :::80                   :::* LISTEN     
> 16144/httpd2-prefor
> 
> If I go to 127.0.0.1 I get the default apache page, but if I got to
> 192.168.1.5(or any of the ips bound) my browser just sits and does nothing.

Apache is probably configured without a default virtual host. 127.0.0.1
is configured to serve content, while the other interfaces are
listening, but not configured properly.

Did you recently upgrade Apache httpd or something? This happened to me
recently -- going from Apache httpd 2.0 to 2.2, the default virtual host
was lost and things started acting funny.

You might want to re-post your error with a new subject: something like
"mod_jk seg fault". I'm no mod_jk expert, and it doesn't look like any
of the mod_jk folks are reading this thread. Once you get Mladen or
Rainer to look at this, they'll have some good ideas.

- -chris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHH1Kc9CaO5/Lv0PARAvveAJ9b1VZQVPqJT8kEoz5Ired+PiBqJACfUywD
mAb1j9Gr5vc/5p0+FAQINc0=
=1bwS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to