Why I did not test this before is because, I donot thought this was a soultion though. Tomorrow another developer add something to the product and there we go. I will be asked "Hey guy increase the memory of the server, that may be the problem, last time it was!!". Then I might need to empoy a guy to do that . ;-) But now I think some programs just needs more memory.. But I have a question to ask you guys. Should not the tomcat server handle my webappliations memory request. Its not a huge weapp. Its just a simple product and my memory request are handled well by my local tomcat.I did not tweak any xml or .sh, both on my remote server and on my local server. Is it a reason of different versions of software running. I do not think there is a compatibility issue with jdk and tomcat anyways. The problem could be because the default VM setting for tomcat in windows is different from the default VM settings in Linux. Thats my conclusion after all.
On 10/11/07, Arun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That worked finally with the increase in PermGen space. > Filip, > I am a bit concerned about my server memory. > See my top (not mine ofcourse) > > > > top - 09:38:18 up 9:16, 3 users, load average: 0.27, 0.18, 0.10 > Tasks: 72 total, 2 running, 70 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 49.1%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 48.9%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074972k total, 429424k used, 1645548k free, 73608k buffers > Swap: 6072528k total, 0k used, 6072528k free, 189848k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 9770 root 25 0 491m 93m 35m R 102 4.6 0:13.64 java > 1 root 15 0 2908 1844 524 S 0 0.1 0:01.41 init > > ================================================================= > > top - 09:38:33 up 9:16, 3 users, load average: 0.43, 0.22, 0.11 > Tasks: 72 total, 2 running, 70 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 48.7%us, 1.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 49.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074972k total, 475488k used, 1599484k free, 73632k buffers > Swap: 6072528k total, 0k used, 6072528k free, 189816k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 9770 root 25 0 504m 138m 35m R 100 6.8 0:28.66 java > 1 root 15 0 2908 1844 524 S 0 0.1 0:01.41 init > > > ================================================================= > > top - 09:38:42 up 9:16, 3 users, load average: 0.52, 0.25, 0.12 > Tasks: 72 total, 2 running, 70 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 48.8%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 50.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074972k total, 509384k used, 1565588k free, 73648k buffers > Swap: 6072528k total, 0k used, 6072528k free, 189800k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 9770 root 25 0 512m 166m 31m R 100 8.2 0:37.63 java > 1 root 15 0 2908 1844 524 S 0 0.1 0:01.41 init > > =================================================================== > > top - 09:39:03 up 9:17, 3 users, load average: 0.45, 0.25, 0.12 > Tasks: 72 total, 1 running, 71 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 47.9%us, 0.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 51.1%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074972k total, 518932k used, 1556040k free, 73680k buffers > Swap: 6072528k total, 0k used, 6072528k free, 189784k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 9770 root 25 0 529m 175m 31m S 96 8.7 0:41.00 java > 4468 mysql 15 0 127m 27m 5336 S 1 1.3 0:14.33 mysqld > > ================================================================ > > top - 09:39:21 up 9:17, 3 users, load average: 0.42, 0.25, 0.13 > Tasks: 72 total, 2 running, 70 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 4.7%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 95.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074972k total, 536952k used, 1538020k free, 73808k buffers > Swap: 6072528k total, 0k used, 6072528k free, 189896k cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 9770 root 25 0 561m 192m 31m S 9 9.5 0:47.93 java > 4468 mysql 15 0 127m 27m 5336 S 1 1.3 0:14.90 mysqld > 1 root 15 0 2908 1844 524 S 0 0.1 0:01.41 init > > > See Mem: line and see the second one . It rises so fast . See at what > rate. > 429424k > 475488k > 509384k > 518932k > 536952k > So at the end of the day, it will be end of the server :-). End Of Servers > , can be a new film. > > What is this PermGen space. Why does not it get garbage collected. > Is there anyway I can tell tomcat to suggest the VM a garbage collection > more often than the default garbage collection algorithm does. Is there any > declerative way of doing, xml, .sh? > > > > > > On 10/11/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space > > > > just increase your permgen size > > > > -XX:MaxPermSize=256m > > > > Filip > > > > Arun wrote: > > > Nope no use. Same error on JDk1.5 > > > > > > INFO: Server startup in 39569 ms > > > Oct 10, 2007 11:05:31 PM > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandlerprocess > > > SEVERE: Error reading request, ignored > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space > > > Exception in thread "http-80-1" java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue.offer ( > > > ConcurrentLinkedQueue.java:180) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler$1.offer( > > > Http11Protocol.java:530) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler$1.offer( > > > Http11Protocol.java:547) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process( > > > Http11Protocol.java:611) > > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run ( > > > JIoEndpoint.java:447) > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) > > > Oct 10, 2007 11:06:29 PM > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandlerprocess > > > SEVERE: Error reading request, ignored > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space > > > Exception in thread "http-80-2" java.lang.NullPointerException > > > at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue.offer( > > > ConcurrentLinkedQueue.java :180) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler$1.offer( > > > Http11Protocol.java:530) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler$1.offer( > > > Http11Protocol.java:547) > > > at > > > > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process( > > > Http11Protocol.java:611) > > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run ( > > > JIoEndpoint.java:447) > > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) > > > Exception in thread "DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-3" > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space > > > Exception in thread "DefaultQuartzScheduler_QuartzSchedulerThread" > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space > > > > > > My server is starting up and OOME is stopping my container. > > > Oh god it is same with all JDK? Should I try upgrading tomcat to > > 6.0.14 > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/10/07, Arun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Chris, > > >> > > >> Let me try installing Jdk1.5 and make same version on both sides. But > > I > > >> need to use jdk1.6 as I need some of the features. > > >> > > >> > > >> On 10/10/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >>> Hash: SHA1 > > >>> > > >>> Arun, > > >>> > > >>> Arun wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Ok, > > >>>> Help!! I do not have an OutOfMemory erro when running tomcat from > > >>>> > > >>> myeclipse. > > >>> > > >>>> I am running JDK1.5 and tomcat6. > > >>>> > > >>>> But in my ubuntu I have jdk1.6 and tomcat6.0 and I have an > > OutOfMemory > > >>>> problem why? > > >>>> > > >>> Compare your memory settings between your Eclipse environment and > > your > > >>> Ubuntu environment. Are they different? What are the specific errors > > > > >>> (which heap is busting?) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> When the server starts up itself the contianer shuts down and logs > > the > > >>>> OutOfMemory error. > > >>>> > > >>> Wow, that sucks. Does your application even try to start? Is the > > >>> QuartzScheduler running from your own application, or do you have it > > in > > >>> a separate one or something else? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> But why did not my local tomcat does not complain.? > > >>>> > > >>> Uhh... different settings? Different memory sizes? Lots of things. > > >>> > > >>> - -chris > > >>> > > >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > > >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > >>> > > >>> iD8DBQFHDRLJ9CaO5/Lv0PARApasAJ9++i+29BbQiS4Pxym/DF/AaayxpgCeIchC > > >>> /9NcH97ppRO+BHCufm6QuPQ= > > >>> =6+Bb > > >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >>> > > >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> -- > > >> Thanks > > >> Arun George > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.6/1060 - Release Date: > > 10/9/2007 4:43 PM > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > Arun George -- Thanks Arun George
