Rainer Jung wrote: > There's an addition in tcnative 1.1.10: > > Author: mturk > Date: Sun Apr 1 22:22:42 2007 > New Revision: 524725 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=524725 > Log: > In case we don't specify the global randFile use like mod_ssl does with > builtin. This fixes long init on some platforms. > > Modified: > tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c > > Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c?view=diff&rev=524725&r1=524724&r2=524725 > ============================================================================== > --- tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c (original) > +++ tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/ssl.c Sun Apr 1 22:22:42 2007 > @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ > file = ssl_global_rand_file; > > if (file == NULL) > - file = RAND_file_name(buffer, sizeof(buffer)); > + return -1; > else if ((n = RAND_egd(file)) > 0) { > return n; > } > > Didn't check, but that might be the difference, concerning respecting > RANDFILE?
I'm not familiar enough with the tcnative or OpenSSL code to understand the change above just by looking at this snippet. But from Mladen's comment it seems to me that this would *introduce* respect for RANDFILE. Am I wrong? Regards mks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
