Could you provide some additional information?
So far 64bit machines always outperformed 32bit machines in my
personal benchmarks as well as in third party benchmarks I stumbled
upon.

So it would be great if you could provide some links or explanations.

thank you
leon

On 7/27/07, Joe Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Christopher Schultz-2 wrote:
> >
> > Joe Nathan wrote:
> >> I would discourage to use such machine! 8GB means you are using 64 bit
> >> machine which will be much slower than 32 bit machines.
> > Huh? Why would a 64-bit machine run slower than a 32-bit machine?
> >
>
> Overall performance depend on many things: CPU speed, number of CPUs,
> memory size, I/O, especially, virtual memory paging, network interface
> bandwidth
> 64bit machines come with better capacity except
> cpu computation speed!
>
> Have you ever tried 64bit Windows desktop or laptop over 32bit machine?
> This will tell you exactly. If your application is data intensive, big
> memory
> over 4GB can work better with reduced I/O operations! Database servers
> or WS that support session information of thousands of users over long
> period of time, having big memory improve performance.
>
> If you have studied computer science and engineering basics, you shouldn't
> be arguing about slowness of 64bit crunchers!
>
> Otherwise 64bit machines suck! That;s why 64bit Windows is not
> popular. I don't them many shops selling!
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-with-8-GB-memory-tf4149367.html#a11826413
> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to