Which way is the better one [between mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp]?
I will second mod_jk too...i had to encrypt the data communication between my apache and tomcat server and using stunnel with mod_jk was so cool and so easy....much less then configuring "https" on mod_proxy....
On 7/19/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, Mladen Turk wrote: >> Which way is the better one [between mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp]? > > It all depends on your topology and needs For instance, I have a complex configuration where some URLs must map to one worker, while other URLs map to another (within the same URL space). I have not been able to figure out how to do this with mod_proxy_ajp, and mod_jk does it perfectly. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGn3AK9CaO5/Lv0PARAoMwAJwM2c384dy3h4Kx5J7z8MhwE9qzTgCgmw3X GE2xh2Rq7yrICxWYCXl9Eao= =ztSI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
