On 6/25/07, lightbulb432 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mention that when you use a static content server, it's generally >> something other that HTTPD. Is there a particular reason for that? What >> static servers have you generally seen in use apart from HTTPD - are >> there >> things that just work "better" in the setup you described than others? > > http://lighttpd.net/ Without using hardware load balancers, how could you implement the architecture whereby (as you described) lighttpd serves static content, Tomcat serves dynamic content, but with the two sets of servers (lighttpd and Tomcat) in parallel rather than lighttpd fronting Tomcat? Would you be required to, in your JSPs, include all links to static content using http://staticserver.site.com/...?
That would be one very good option. I think ebay uses it and many others. Another option would be for example puting a squid infront of the tomcat and let it cache the static tomcat served by tomcat (and any other cacheable content). Its almost the same as apache httpd infront, but squid is faster in a number of things. However, I think there are a lot of possible solutons, without knowing your usecase its hard to pick one :-) regards Leon
What are all the available options to implement this setup? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/In-Process-Tomcat-tf3972772.html#a11290376 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
