"Christopher Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bill, > > Bill Barker wrote: >> This would let us >> see what mod_proxy_ajp is sending to Tomcat (which I very strongly >> suspect >> is wrong). > > Tomcat should still accept any valid numeric Content-Length header, even > if it exceeds Integer.MAX_VALUE. The Java AJP connector currently > requires an int, but should accept something larger (albeit with reduced > support through the HttpServletRequest.getContentLength method). > > An end user should always be able to parse their own Content-Length > header for large values. In this case, mod_whatever is breaking the > number. However, once mod_whatever is fixed, the AJP connector will > still trip over the fact that the value exceeds maxint. > > (Looks like you have a fix for that. Which connectors does it cover?) >
All of the non-deprecated ones now from TC 3.3-6.x (at least in SVN), including the upcoming TC 5.5.24: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/200706.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] But they mostly worked (or at least didn't do more than drop the connection) before this. >> However, if my guess is right, then the problem is with httpd sending a >> bad >> value for the Content-Length header, so you would have to report it over >> there and get it fixed. I don't have enough spare cycles to test this >> myself, but I'm sure that between you and Chris it will get nailed down. > > Two mod_jk heavy-lifters frequent the list (Mladen and Rainer). If it > turns out that Daniel is using mod_jk, they should be notified > separately. From Daniel's messages plus the info available in the bug, > it's unclear whether he is using mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp. That > information is important to identify before bothering someone on either > project ;) > Of course both Mladen and Rainer are on [EMAIL PROTECTED], so they have seen the traffic on the bug report (as are a couple of the other mod_proxy_ajp developers). > This discussion can probably be taken off the mailing list and into > Bugzilla: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42608 > Unless you are also on [EMAIL PROTECTED], you haven't CCed yourself on this one. > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGbtD59CaO5/Lv0PARAhnOAJ4lyY65R4Ery20fPa0vDortYsO3vwCgroyq > JSIy1JBN/u7zFBRS0nj4HKw= > =+YL4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
