IE is sending "Pragma: no-cache" when it requests the admin page ("Request
3" in your previous message). Firefox isn't, so I'm guessing Tomcat is
assuming that FF has a copy.
This is just what I noticed, I'm not an HTTP or Tomcat expert.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Kenneth Westelinck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 04 April, 2007 09:19
|
| I did some further researching. I found this on the 304 returned by Tomcat
| when using firefox:
| -----8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<----
| ---8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<--
| You should never see this error in your Web browser. It should simply
| present the Web page from its cache - because it believes the page has not
| changed since it was last cached. If your client is not a Web browser,
| then
| it should equally be able to present the page from a cache. If unable to
| do
| so, it is not using the If_Modified_Since or related headers correctly.
| -----8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<----
| ---8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<-------8<--
|
| When I disable caching in firefox, authentication works as it should and I
| get redirected as I should. So who's the culprit here. Firefox or Tomcat?
-----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential
proprietary property of Nelnet, Inc. and its affiliated
companies (Nelnet) and is intended for the recipient only.
Any reproduction, forwarding, or copying without the express
permission of Nelnet is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to this e-mail.
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
